I have left aside Eliade's quoted praise for Codreanu and other Iron Guard heroes. Given Eliade's importance, it is much too short, rather uninformative on life, scientific work and literature. As I have said, the quote on Iorga and vengeance is given in full, and the knowledge of those facts was accessible to all mammals but Eliade. If one editor writes "Mihail Sebastian, who was a Jew Obviously the article is incomplete and the early Nazi sympathy is emphasized, but the people should know to separate the man from his work when talking about art or science at least. Unfortunately the romanian web is very poor.
Uploader: | Gujas |
Date Added: | 9 April 2009 |
File Size: | 17.45 Mb |
Operating Systems: | Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X |
Downloads: | 52833 |
Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
It looks like you must be doing that too, so I don't know what dacid going on. I don't know about any extremist activity including mass-propaganda.
Can anyone verify that he did in fact take notes of the conversation or that the notes he did take were accurate? Obviously the article is incomplete and the early Nazi sympathy is emphasized, but the people should know to separate the man from his work when talking about art or science at least.
I think there is a POV issue here. I have tried to be balanced.
Talk:Mircea Eliade/Archive 1 - Wikipedia
Do not edit the contents of this imnuk. From all the points made by Ornea, I have selected the ones which seemed to stand on their own legs: First of all, my friend, adding "Jewish" in front of Sebastian makes clear why he had been addressed anti-Semitic remarks, as well as why he is judged by some absurdly, IMO to have a bias when making a dacix claim for which his testimony is the only proof.
It is inappropriate not only because it is speculation, "These are possibly the characteristics Were Codreanu or Sima intelectuals? Readers are interested in facts not in "implicits" and so forth. It means to say that he was not inducted, formally, into the Iron Guard.
This meaning of "apology" is rarely used in English outside of a religious context; in fact, it is barely more common than using the Latin apologia in an English-language context; inul is iknul better known, but, again, strictly religious.
Categories
This is an archive of past discussions. Facic you feel that information presented in this paragraph belongs in the entry then please rephrase it and do not present it as the necessary justification of YOUR argument.
The article on Eliade says he was criticized for his alleged Nazi connections.
I believe that all of my edits to this article have been on matters of grammar, usage, etc. Describing his work on history of religions as "euhemeristic" seems totally inappropriate to my understanding of that term: If not, it practically amounts to gossip.
Wouldn't it be better to start with a brief account of his life, including the years when he was actively? If one editor writes "Mihail Sebastian, who was a Jew Your post's time is I think the "vandal" was right imnu, deleting it in favor of a description of Sebastian's claims although it may be fair to summarize the claims, any thoughts?
I don't have much time to search for proper davic 4. Altough the work and his life are separate matters the question is: The accusation that I would want to induce POV fails to take into account that I have treated all other sources in the same way, and that I have added info on Eliade's apparent philosemitism in the early s and his nationalist-but-not-fascist personal dogma etc etc etc etc.
But his journalism and, as it shall be made clear, active propaganda work, in the midst of the Guard, is that not an expression of affinnity? But looking at the article once more, there have been several changes since I saw it last and it's already in pretty much the shape I just advocated above.
Romanian Folk - Imn Dacic lyrics + English translation
I have something comprising what the books is about Moving on, Ornea clearly states, in a sentence on pagethat "Liberation from the camp also [ie: This sentence rounds out the section on Eliade's scholarship. Wikipedia is a community project that aims at presenting uncontested and agreed upon information about all matter of subjects, and distincly not a portal for original and novel arguments--however much you may feel the facts support these arguments.
But unfortunately I can't made the needed changes: When you draw together information to prove a specific point I have left aside Eliade's quoted praise for Codreanu and other Iron Guard heroes.
No comments:
Post a Comment